Alliance Rail accuses DfT of blackmail over East Coast

Virgin Trains East Coast 43239 climbs under the North London Line at Belle Isle, north London, on March 30, with the 1606 King’s Cross-Leeds, passing Grand Central 43465 trailing the 1228 Sunderland-King’s Cross. GC is one of two open access operators on the East Coast Main Line.  ANTONY GUPPY.

Alliance Rail has accused the Department for Transport of blackmailing Britain’s independent rail regulator by threatening to withdraw funding for East Coast Main Line upgrades if the regulator allows more open access services to run.

The parent company of open access operator Grand Central made the accusation at a meeting convened by the regulator (the Office of Rail and Road, ORR) on March 4, to discuss the merits of competing bids for paths on the ECML.

It follows January’s launch by the DfT of a consultation into a report by Network Rail Chairman Sir Peter Hendy into NR’s upgrade programme.

In this consultation launch document DfT said: “The appraisal to date of the ECML connectivity enhancement is based upon specific assumptions about the services that will operate on the line. On the basis of this appraisal, the Secretary of State is minded to proceed with this enhancement.

“However, forthcoming decisions that may be taken by the ORR regarding access rights for open access operators on the line could impact on this and may detract from the business case for this enhancement. The Secretary of State’s decision is, therefore, dependent upon the outcomes of the ORR’s decisions on open access and may need to be reconsidered after those decisions.”

At the March 4 meeting, Alliance Rail’s representative said of DfT’s threat to remove funding for ECML improvements, which had been approved as part of ORR’s funding determination for Control Period 5 (2014-2019) back in 2013: “This fund was approved as part of the regulatory settlement, as far as I’m aware, and it would appear to me that the DfT is now trying to retrospectively review a regulatory settlement for something that just doesn’t suit.”

  • For much more on this, read RAIL 798, published on April 13.

Comment as guest

Login  /  Register


  • Noam Bleicher - 11/04/2016 09:11

    If we had a decent, consistent, nationally-specified Inter City service, there would be no need for Open Access, other than a token hourly service at best. This is how it works in most continental countries and is much better than the patchy service standards we have here.

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register
  • Mike Richardson - 11/04/2016 09:54

    So the CMA says more OAOs are good for competition/the passenger but the Govt is too worried about premium payments.

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register

RAIL is Britain's market leading modern railway magazine.

Download the app

Related content