Transfer to rail freight would slash HGV traffic, says CBT

The Campaign for Better Transport says that more focused efforts to switch freight off road and onto rail and waterways could cut Heavy Goods Vehicle traffic on the busiest roads by up to 21%, with congestion falling by up to 25% if rail and water freight increases by 50%.

Government figures that estimate a maximum reduction of around just 7% in road traffic as a result of such transfers are skewed, says the CBT.

It claims the estimates are based on national statistics that include light goods vehicles, whose loads tend to be less suitable for rail.

But by targeting the heaviest vehicles, longest journeys and busiest routes, total traffic flow could be cut by 10%, with up to a 40% reduction in the most congested areas.

Official statistics suggest that 20% of all journeys made by HGVs with four or more axles are longer than 300km (186 miles), and 24% are between 200km (125 miles) and 300km in length.

The CBT is calling on the Government to develop a new freight strategy “recognising the significant role of mode transfer in reducing congestion on key parts of the strategic road network, and setting out a route map for rebalancing the freight transport market”.

While the CBT recognises the need for investment in alternatives to road (such as on the busy A14 corridor), it further says that HGVs should be charged on a system using weight, distance and vehicle quality, as in Switzerland and Germany. Such a move would make the relative costs of road and rail more transparent.

Furthermore, where HGVs constitute a particularly large proportion of traffic, the reduction in road tonne-kilometres could be as high as 75%, with a transfer to rail alone cutting overall congestion by up to 20%.

“While the Government is committed to investing significant funds in the railways and in rail freight in particular, it has underestimated the full extent to which this investment could reduce road congestion,” said CBT Freight on Rail Manager Philippa Edmunds.

“The Government should take account in its forecasting and modelling, and in its policy and spending, the potential to shift HGV traffic to rail and water and the congestion, safety and pollution benefits of doing so.”

Comment as guest

Login  /  Register


  • Anthony Woodward - 11/05/2015 09:38

    We will not witness any meaningful transport modal switch while decisions are predicated on the vast amount of party funding from the road lobby gifted to the Conservatives. We need government that is driven by the desire to independently enhance UK plc and not a continuing government where the first priority is the party's financial survival. Govern for the people and not solely for one's political existence.

    Reply as guest

    Login  /  Register

RAIL is Britain's market leading modern railway magazine.

Download the app

Related content