An act of betrayal by the PM?

Imagine, at the time they were being planned, someone seriously arguing that the M1, M6 and M62 motorways should never have been built and that far greater benefits would have been created by upgrading existing A and B class roads.

They would have been ridiculed and laughed out of the discussion.  Aye, back then, when the M62 was the biggest and most difficult civil engineering project in Europe, we had vision, confidence and a much clearer eye for what’s important. But in the midst of building this generation’s biggest civil engineering project in Europe, we seem to be in danger of losing the plot.

Rumours (and that’s all they are at the moment) that Government will abandon High Speed 2 East (HS2E) from Birmingham, through the East Midlands to Leeds, are being widely reported - and not for the first time.

These flames are being eagerly fanned by long-time enemies of the project, including blinkered Greens (Greens for HS2 are an honourable exception), high-profile newspaper pundits, and the Institute for Government’s Professor Stephen Glaister. Their condemnation of HS2 is naturally being given wide exposure in TV and the print media. But, yet again, misconceptions have circled the globe before the truth has even put its boots on.  Same old… same old….

So, let’s make a couple of things clear. First, just about every cost figure you see reported is massively inflated partly because of ludicrous Treasury contingencies on the one hand and insane Phase 1 procurement policies on the other. These passed so-called design risk on to the contractors building the railway, whereby they became responsible for structural resilience for maybe 25 years. This led to eye-watering ‘gold plating’ of construction standards on the one hand and gobsmackingly high insurance costs on the other. I’ve written extensively about this both here and on Twitter. Search Twitter for @RAIL HS2 costs and you’ll find lots to read. I hadn’t realised just how much I’ve tweeted about this!

Yes, HS2 Ltd Chief Executive Mark Thurston did tell the House of Commons Transport Select Committee (July 14) that work is currently prioritising on HS2 West (HS2W)… but that’s not the same as saying that HS2E is being scrapped. Until I hear Prime Minister Boris Johnson reverse his frequently repeated, unambiguous promise to “build the HS2 network in its entirety”, then Government policy remains unchanged, whatever the headlines, critics and mischief makers might imply.

Government has a long tradition of ‘testing the water’ on potentially controversial decisions which might blow up in its face,  and I have no doubt elements of that are going on here. So, we HS2E supporters need to redouble our efforts to make it clear not only to Government, but also to communities on HS2E’s line of route (and to the country as a whole) just what is at stake if this fundam-entally important aspect of the project was to be scrapped. The tranche of recent northern ‘Red Wall’ Conservative MPs, on whom the Government needs to remember that its Parliamentary majority depends, also need to stop snoring and sniff the coffee.

HS2 and Government messaging in the early days (a decade or so ago) was admittedly dire, and the myth took root among critics that HS2 was all about saving a few minutes on journeys to Birmingham. This was never the case. Check out Andrew Adonis’ very first HS2 speeches in the House of Lords - they major on capacity.

And enhancing network capacity is still the raison ‘d’être of HS2 - with HS2E playing a crucial role. It is transformative and delivers the scheme’s greatest benefits. Without the eastern arm, HS2’s whole purpose is destroyed and it becomes nothing more than a very expensive West Coast Main Line by-pass, benefiting only the western half of the country - and with a much worse BCR (benefit:cost ratio) as well.

Far from ‘levelling up’, the Prime Minister would fragment the UK further by adding an east-west economic divide to the long-existing north-south problem! The political damage for the Conservatives would ripple outwards from ground zero in Leeds, which is already a transport ‘black hole’ in every sense.

Along with the equally deprived East Midlands, Leeds has been at the heart of zero transport infrastructure investment in decades. Not only the Conservative Red Wall is at risk - the  political fallout and damage would radiate north through York to Newcastle, both of which are already grumpy about being beyond the end of HS2E as it currently stands.

The Conservatives would be committing political suicide by scrapping HS2E - and I rather suspect they know it. Yorkshire folk would be rightly and especially unforgiving of such a personal betrayal by the Prime Minister. Scrap HS2E and the entire East Coast Main Line, which is already under intense pressure, will increasingly struggle to cope.

The Department for Transport recently asked Network Rail Chief Executive Andrew Haines to come up with an operator-neutral timetable to tackle this and to make best use of its heavily congested tracks. Over the past 30 years, the ECML has not delivered performance much above  88%, which is an indication of how hard-pressed this near-200-year-old infrastructure is today. Scrap HS2E and millions of people in and around Sheffield, Leeds, Bradford, Teesside and Tyneside will all have to struggle on with ancient rail infrastructure which can barely cope today, while to the west, a very expensive and shiny HS2 WCML by-pass will deliver major benefits for millions of people and hundreds of stations in western England. Levelling up, Boris?!

Now let’s look at national transport needs and the growing clamour for decarbonisation in the wake of self-evident climate change and increasing instances of extreme weather.

For the UK to stand any chance of hitting its GHG (greenhouse gas) targets on time, rail needs to double its capacity in the next 30 years. This simply cannot be done by any amount of existing route capacity enhancement, and it is fantasy to think otherwise.

Remember the West Coast Route Modernisation, 20 years ago? It came in five times over budget, caused a decade of ruinous and costly disruption, and yet yielded only minor capacity improvements. Anyone who thinks this is the answer across the country is deluded.

I’m rolling my eyes now, but anyone who seriously believes that we can tackle climate change by fitting overhead live wires on motorways and pantographs on lorries is equally disconnected from reality. What happens at simple junctions, let alone ‘Spaghetti Junction?!’ Imagine the dewire-ments… and the  costs?!

There are only two answers to decarbonising and doubling rail capacity: a rolling pro-gramme of electrification (on railways, not roads) and building HS2 in full. HS2E isn’t an optional extra. HS2E is the core of the project and is key to all the benefits. It is fantasy to suggest otherwise.

HS2E is the only way to achieve the doubling of capacity on the network as a whole. Moving the fast trains from the West Coast, East Coast and Midland Main Lines to HS2W and HS2E (which relieves not one, but two of those trunk routes) is what enables and then turbo-charges capacity enhancement on the rest of the network.

Firstly, and most simply, it decongests those three principal trunk routes by removing hundreds of trains and creating lots of space for other passenger and freight traffic.

Secondly, the fact that it’s the fast trains that will switch to HS2 turbo-charges this benefit because 125mph trains are very greedy on space - they need many miles to stop and require lots of clear track in front of them.

This restricts not only how many trains you can run, but also what sort of other (slower) trains you can slot between them. You cannot, for example, have lots of reignited local and inter-urban passenger trains which stop at intermediate stations on a two-track main line because they get in the way of those fast trains thundering through, so you get lots of intermediate stations with very poor (or even no) services. Milton Keynes, a large station,  suffers very badly because of this.

Put all the WCML, MML and ECML fast trains onto HS2W and HS2E and you have three suddenly very quiet main lines on which you can run an intense 100mph stopping train service to many more intermediate stations, along with lots more freight.

Scrap HS2E and these transformative benefits are lost, while keeping the greater part of the construction costs, which hammers the BCR.  It makes no sense. It’s mad.

Let’s put some flesh on the bones. Here are just some of the increased local and inter-urban major service benefits that would be lost by scrapping HS2E:

On the Midland Main Line between St Pancras and Leicester, Nottingham, Derby and Sheffield.

On the East Coast Main Line between King’s Cross and Peterborough, Grantham, Newark, Doncaster, Leeds and York.

On the CrossCountry route between Birmingham, Derby, Sheffield, Leeds and York.

On ALL connecting and secondary lines that serve these routes and thereby rely on their capacity.

Comment as guest

Login  /  Register


No comments have been made yet.

RAIL is Britain's market leading modern railway magazine.

Download the app

Related content